From the Public Sphere to Digital Power: Understanding AI’s Role in Afghanistan’s Political Transformation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65496/jssme.2026.89Keywords:
Algorithmic Bias, Artificial Intelligence, Digital Power, Political Engagement, Political Transformation, Public SphereAbstract
Over the past decade, artificial intelligence (AI) has had a profound impact on politics, public relations, and the way people interact with the state. This study focuses on the transformation of digital political engagement through AI technology in Afghanistan, where technological infrastructure, media freedom, and digital literacy are still weak. The study draws on Jürgen Habermas’s theory of “public sphere” and the theory of “technological arbitrage” to explore how AI is transforming information transparency, public participation, and the transparency of political decisions. The study was conducted using à quantitative and descriptive-analytical method, with data collected through a questionnaire from 217 political science graduates from private universities in Nangarhar province. According to the results, AI offers opportunities for promoting transparency, better data management, and good governance, but also carries serious risks of misinformation, algorithmic bias, and digital deception. Most participants affirmed the need for ethical frameworks, Sharia principles, and a national legal system. The study concludes that the future of Afghanistan’s digital democracy will only be bright when the public’s digital literacy, public awareness, and principles of transparency and accountability are strengthened. This shift will transform artificial intelligence from a tool of control to a tool of popular power.
Downloads
References
Al Jazeera. (2024, June 19). A lack of trust: How deepfakes and AI could rattle the US elections. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/6/19/a-lack-of-trust-how-deepfakes-and-ai-could-rattle-the-us-elections
AllahRakha, N. (2024). UNESCO’s AI Ethics Principles: Challenges and Opportunities. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(9), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.225 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.225
Bradshaw, S., Millard, C., & Wang, B. (2020). AI, governance and democracy: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 17(3), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2020.1773285
Brożek, B., Jakubiec, M., & Stelmach, J. (2024). The black box society: Ethics and epistemology of artificial intelligence. AI & Society, 39(1), 1–18.
ChEsterman, S. (2023). The Tragedy of AI Governance. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4600065 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4600065
Dev.ua. (2024). Nostrada.ai: AI tool to communicate with the UK parliament. https://dev.ua/en/news/shi-versii-chleniv-parlamentu-brytanii-1747642472
European Commission. (2023). Regulation on artificial intelligence: Transparency and accountability measures. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/ai-act
Feenberg, A. (2017). Technosystem: The social life of reason. Harvard University Press. Jstor.org. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv24w64m4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674982109
Fereniki Panagopoulou, Parpoula, C., & Kostas Karpouzis. (2025). Legal perspectives on AI and the right to digital literacy in education. Frontiers in Computer Science, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2025.1692268 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2025.1692268
Foos, F. (2024). The Use of AI by Election Campaigns. LSE Public Policy Review, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.31389/lseppr.112 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31389/lseppr.112
Fuchs, C. (2020). Communication and capitalism: A critical theory. University of Westminster Press. https://doi.org/10.16997/book45 DOI: https://doi.org/10.16997/book45
Garnett, H. A., & James, T. S. (2023). Electoral backsliding? Democratic divergence and trajectories in the quality of elections worldwide. Electoral Studies, 86, 102696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102696 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102696
Gonzales, S. (2024). AI literacy and the new digital divide: A global call to action. Unesco.org. https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/articles/ai-literacy-and-new-digital-divide-global-call-action
Gstrein, O. J., Haleem, N., & Zwitter, A. (2024). General-purpose AI regulation and the European Union AI Act. Internet Policy Review, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.14763/2024.3.1790 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14763/2024.3.1790
Habermas, J. (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society (Trans. by Burger T. with the Assistance of Lawrence F.). Polity Press, Cambridge, 161.
Human Rights Watch (HRW). (2022). AI, media, and freedom of information in Afghanistan. https://www.hrw.org/report/2022/afghanistan-ai-and-freedom-of-information
Kahl, P. (2025). Redefining democracy for the age of AI: AI governance and the fiduciary turn in the architecture of knowledge. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17557933
Kozyreva, A., Lorenz-Spreen, P., Hertwig, R., Lewandowsky, S., & Herzog, S. (2021). Public attitudes towards algorithmic personalization and use of personal data online: Evidence from Germany, Great Britain, and the United States. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), Article 117. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00787-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00787-w
Kumar, R., Singh, P., & Gupta, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence in political campaigns: An emerging paradigm. Political Science Review, 12(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/xxxxxx
Livingstone, S. (2020). Digital literacy and democratic participation in the age of AI. Media, Culture & Society, 42(7–8), 1231–1249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720930593
Maphephe, J. (2025). Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Its Role in Electoral Integrity in the Context of the 2024. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5473305
McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. McGraw-Hill. Dokumen.pub. https://dokumen.pub/understanding-media-the-extensions-of-man-9781584235125.html
Nasiri, S., & Hashemzadeh, A. (2025). The Evolution of Disinformation from Fake News Propaganda to AI-driven Narratives as Deepfake. Journal of Cyberspace Studies, 9(1), 229–250. https://doi.org/10.22059/jcss.2025.387249.1119
NAYLA, A. (2025). Digitized Democracy: How AI is Reshaping Governance and Civic Life. National Civic Review, 114(3), 53–59. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48845121
OECD. (2021). Artificial intelligence in government: Policies, ethics and opportunities. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/publications/artificial-intelligence-in-government-2021.htm
OECD. (2025). Governing with artificial intelligence: The state of play and way forward in core government functions. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2025/06/governing-with-artificial-intelligence_398fa287.html DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/795de142-en
Raji, I. D., Smart, A., White, R. N., & Mitchell, M. (2020). Closing the AI accountability gap: Defining an end-to-end framework for internal algorithmic auditing. Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375627.3375832 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372873
Rauchfleisch, A., Jungherr, A., & Wuttke, A. (2025). Explaining public preferences for regulating Artificial Intelligence in election campaigns: Evidence from the U.S. and Taiwan. Telecommunications Policy, 103072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103072
Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson. http://lib.ysu.am/disciplines_bk/efdd4d1d4c2087fe1cbe03d9ced67f34.pdf
Safi, M. (2022). Social media, misinformation, and political instability in Afghanistan. Central Asian Survey, 41(2), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2022.2034567
Shaikh, M. I. (2025). AI governance and the dynamics of legitimacy, fairness, and transparency. ISACA. https://www.isaca.org/resources/news-and-trends/isaca-now-blog/2025/ai-governance-dynamics-of-legitimacy-fairness-and-transparency
Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2018). How AI can be a force for good in democracy. Philosophy & Technology, 31(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0322-1
Tiernan, P., Costello, E., Donlon, E., Parysz, M., & Scriney, M. (2023). Information and Media Literacy in the Age of AI: Options for the Future. Education Sciences, 13(9), 906. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090906 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090906
UNDP. (2023). Digital transformation in Afghanistan: Opportunities and challenges for AI. United Nations Development Programme. https://www.af.undp.org/content/afghanistan/en/home/library/digital-transformation-ai.html
Washington Post. (2024, May 2). Dos and don’ts of campaigning with AI in the 2024 US elections. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/05/02/dos-donts-campaigning-with-ai
Winner, L. (1986). The whale and the reactor: A search for limits in an age of high technology. University of Chicago Press. https://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/students/envs_5110/whale_reactor.pdf
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs. https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=56791
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 ibrahim Sekandary, Toryalia yousafzia, Qudratullah Sangeen (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles in The Journal of Social Science and Multidisciplinary Enquiry (JSSME) are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
-
Authors retain copyright and grant JSSME the right to publish and distribute their work.
-
Anyone may share, copy, redistribute, adapt, and build upon the work for any purpose, including commercial use, provided proper attribution is given.
-
Attribution must include the author’s name(s), article title, journal name, DOI (if available), and the statement “Licensed under CC BY 4.0”.
-
Third-party material not covered by the license must be clearly identified, and separate permission may be required for reuse.
-
JSSME is not responsible for any use of the work by others.

