From the Public Sphere to Digital Power: Understanding AI’s Role in Afghanistan’s Political Transformation

Authors

  • ibrahim Sekandary Amir Ali Sher Navoiy University, Nangarhar, Afghanistan Author
  • Toryalia yousafzia Amir Ali Shernovioy University, Nangrahar, Afghanistan Author
  • Qudratullah Sangeen Matanat University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65496/jssme.2026.89

Keywords:

Algorithmic Bias, Artificial Intelligence, Digital Power, Political Engagement, Political Transformation, Public Sphere

Abstract

Over the past decade, artificial intelligence (AI) has had a profound impact on politics, public relations, and the way people interact with the state. This study focuses on the transformation of digital political engagement through AI technology in Afghanistan, where technological infrastructure, media freedom, and digital literacy are still weak. The study draws on Jürgen Habermas’s theory of “public sphere” and the theory of “technological arbitrage” to explore how AI is transforming information transparency, public participation, and the transparency of political decisions. The study was conducted using à quantitative and descriptive-analytical method, with data collected through a questionnaire from 217 political science graduates from private universities in Nangarhar province. According to the results, AI offers opportunities for promoting transparency, better data management, and good governance, but also carries serious risks of misinformation, algorithmic bias, and digital deception. Most participants affirmed the need for ethical frameworks, Sharia principles, and a national legal system. The study concludes that the future of Afghanistan’s digital democracy will only be bright when the public’s digital literacy, public awareness, and principles of transparency and accountability are strengthened. This shift will transform artificial intelligence from a tool of control to a tool of popular power.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al Jazeera. (2024, June 19). A lack of trust: How deepfakes and AI could rattle the US elections. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/6/19/a-lack-of-trust-how-deepfakes-and-ai-could-rattle-the-us-elections

AllahRakha, N. (2024). UNESCO’s AI Ethics Principles: Challenges and Opportunities. International Journal of Law and Policy, 2(9), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.225 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.225

Bradshaw, S., Millard, C., & Wang, B. (2020). AI, governance and democracy: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 17(3), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2020.1773285

Brożek, B., Jakubiec, M., & Stelmach, J. (2024). The black box society: Ethics and epistemology of artificial intelligence. AI & Society, 39(1), 1–18.

ChEsterman, S. (2023). The Tragedy of AI Governance. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4600065 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4600065

Dev.ua. (2024). Nostrada.ai: AI tool to communicate with the UK parliament. https://dev.ua/en/news/shi-versii-chleniv-parlamentu-brytanii-1747642472

European Commission. (2023). Regulation on artificial intelligence: Transparency and accountability measures. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/ai-act

Feenberg, A. (2017). Technosystem: The social life of reason. Harvard University Press. Jstor.org. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv24w64m4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674982109

Fereniki Panagopoulou, Parpoula, C., & Kostas Karpouzis. (2025). Legal perspectives on AI and the right to digital literacy in education. Frontiers in Computer Science, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2025.1692268 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2025.1692268

Foos, F. (2024). The Use of AI by Election Campaigns. LSE Public Policy Review, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.31389/lseppr.112 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31389/lseppr.112

Fuchs, C. (2020). Communication and capitalism: A critical theory. University of Westminster Press. https://doi.org/10.16997/book45 DOI: https://doi.org/10.16997/book45

Garnett, H. A., & James, T. S. (2023). Electoral backsliding? Democratic divergence and trajectories in the quality of elections worldwide. Electoral Studies, 86, 102696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102696 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102696

Gonzales, S. (2024). AI literacy and the new digital divide: A global call to action. Unesco.org. https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/articles/ai-literacy-and-new-digital-divide-global-call-action

Gstrein, O. J., Haleem, N., & Zwitter, A. (2024). General-purpose AI regulation and the European Union AI Act. Internet Policy Review, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.14763/2024.3.1790 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14763/2024.3.1790

Habermas, J. (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society (Trans. by Burger T. with the Assistance of Lawrence F.). Polity Press, Cambridge, 161.

Human Rights Watch (HRW). (2022). AI, media, and freedom of information in Afghanistan. https://www.hrw.org/report/2022/afghanistan-ai-and-freedom-of-information

‌Kahl, P. (2025). Redefining democracy for the age of AI: AI governance and the fiduciary turn in the architecture of knowledge. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17557933

Kozyreva, A., Lorenz-Spreen, P., Hertwig, R., Lewandowsky, S., & Herzog, S. (2021). Public attitudes towards algorithmic personalization and use of personal data online: Evidence from Germany, Great Britain, and the United States. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), Article 117. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00787-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00787-w

Kumar, R., Singh, P., & Gupta, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence in political campaigns: An emerging paradigm. Political Science Review, 12(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/xxxxxx

Livingstone, S. (2020). Digital literacy and democratic participation in the age of AI. Media, Culture & Society, 42(7–8), 1231–1249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720930593

Maphephe, J. (2025). Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Its Role in Electoral Integrity in the Context of the 2024. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5473305

McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. McGraw-Hill. Dokumen.pub. https://dokumen.pub/understanding-media-the-extensions-of-man-9781584235125.html

Nasiri, S., & Hashemzadeh, A. (2025). The Evolution of Disinformation from Fake News Propaganda to AI-driven Narratives as Deepfake. Journal of Cyberspace Studies, 9(1), 229–250. https://doi.org/10.22059/jcss.2025.387249.1119

‌NAYLA, A. (2025). Digitized Democracy: How AI is Reshaping Governance and Civic Life. National Civic Review, 114(3), 53–59. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48845121

OECD. (2021). Artificial intelligence in government: Policies, ethics and opportunities. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/publications/artificial-intelligence-in-government-2021.htm

OECD. (2025). Governing with artificial intelligence: The state of play and way forward in core government functions. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2025/06/governing-with-artificial-intelligence_398fa287.html DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/795de142-en

Raji, I. D., Smart, A., White, R. N., & Mitchell, M. (2020). Closing the AI accountability gap: Defining an end-to-end framework for internal algorithmic auditing. Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375627.3375832 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372873

Rauchfleisch, A., Jungherr, A., & Wuttke, A. (2025). Explaining public preferences for regulating Artificial Intelligence in election campaigns: Evidence from the U.S. and Taiwan. Telecommunications Policy, 103072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103072

Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson. http://lib.ysu.am/disciplines_bk/efdd4d1d4c2087fe1cbe03d9ced67f34.pdf

Safi, M. (2022). Social media, misinformation, and political instability in Afghanistan. Central Asian Survey, 41(2), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2022.2034567

Shaikh, M. I. (2025). AI governance and the dynamics of legitimacy, fairness, and transparency. ISACA. https://www.isaca.org/resources/news-and-trends/isaca-now-blog/2025/ai-governance-dynamics-of-legitimacy-fairness-and-transparency

Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2018). How AI can be a force for good in democracy. Philosophy & Technology, 31(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0322-1

Tiernan, P., Costello, E., Donlon, E., Parysz, M., & Scriney, M. (2023). Information and Media Literacy in the Age of AI: Options for the Future. Education Sciences, 13(9), 906. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090906 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090906

UNDP. (2023). Digital transformation in Afghanistan: Opportunities and challenges for AI. United Nations Development Programme. https://www.af.undp.org/content/afghanistan/en/home/library/digital-transformation-ai.html

Washington Post. (2024, May 2). Dos and don’ts of campaigning with AI in the 2024 US elections. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/05/02/dos-donts-campaigning-with-ai

Winner, L. (1986). The whale and the reactor: A search for limits in an age of high technology. University of Chicago Press. https://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/students/envs_5110/whale_reactor.pdf

Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs. https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=56791

Downloads

Published

2026-06-13

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Sekandary, ibrahim, Toryalia yousafzia, & Qudratullah Sangeen. (2026). From the Public Sphere to Digital Power: Understanding AI’s Role in Afghanistan’s Political Transformation. Journal of Social Science and Multidisciplinary Enquiry, 2(1), 57-68. https://doi.org/10.65496/jssme.2026.89